The most important historical development in the last 200 years was not the splitting of the atom or the invention of the internal combustion engine or the spread of the computer chip, but the advent of a new religious mode.<\/p>\n
The most illuminating person that I have known personally, my mentor for 24 years, Joseph W. Mathews,\u00a0 first called this history-changing event\u00a0 \u201cthe advent of the secular religious<\/strong>.\u201d\u00a0 The four-day course that he and we who were his colleagues\u00a0 taught to thousands of clergy began with a lecture on the cultural revolution.\u00a0 The heart of that lecture was on what we called \u201cthe secular revolution.\u201d\u00a0 In that talk we spelled out how the ancient two-story metaphorical thinking is being replaced by living in one and only one\u00a0 realm of reality.\u00a0 In that talk we also noted how the imagery of angels and demons was being replaced by imagery about historically unfolding relationships. We opened that course for religious leaders with this talk because we claimed that this revolution in religious sensibilities set the context for the renewal of Christianity and every other religion that one might want to renew.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Later, Mathews claimed that we had stumbled upon an even deeper perception of the secular religious revolution.\u00a0 He called it the discovery of the\u00a0 other\u00a0 world\u00a0 in the midst\u00a0 of\u00a0 this\u00a0 world<\/strong>.\u00a0\u00a0 He\u00a0 illustrated how in the midst of our ordinary everyday living we were experiencing the burning through of the Spirit states spoken about in the old way of talking.\u00a0 Mathews gave the illustration of a piece of paper, representing our lives, having a lighted match beneath it.\u00a0 First the paper begins to brown, and then it flames.\u00a0 Spirit is like that; it browns and flames the ordinary paper of of our everyday lives. This is not supernatural imagery.\u00a0 There is no heavenly realm.\u00a0 Spirit experience happens here and now as the depth dimension of this one reality burns through the more superficial aspects of that one reality.<\/p>\n A lecture on this topic appears in the book of Mathews\u2019 talks, Bending History, that John Epps and others pulled together.\u00a0\u00a0 On page 164 begins a talk entitled\u00a0 \u201cThe Recovery of the Other World.\u201d\u00a0 I count this talk one of the most important talks in that book.<\/p>\n The significance of these insights I picture as a historical chart that lives in my mind.\u00a0 Sometime in the nineteenth century humanity began an awakenment to the cultural death of a metaphor that had been used and had been found useful for as long as human memory can reach.\u00a0 I picture this now obsolete metaphor as a double-deck chart.\u00a0 The top deck is named \u201cmythic thinking\u201d and the lower deck is named \u201cempirical thinking.\u00a0 This old metaphor was operative throughout recorded history and long before history was recorded.\u00a0\u00a0 In primitive tribal societies this metaphor was not seen as a metaphor nor described with the words like \u201cmyth\u201d and \u201dempirical.\u201d\u00a0 Nevertheless, the metaphor was operative.<\/p>\n Let us picture a tribal society that had not yet discovered the male role in the origin of new human lives.\u00a0 All they could see was the wonder of new human life emerging from the womb of woman.\u00a0 They used this ordinary experience as a metaphor for Reality as a whole. They envisioned\u00a0 the story of the whole cosmos as a great womb from which all ordinary things emerged. They also viewed this same cosmic womb as a great tomb into which all things returned.\u00a0 Between womb and tomb we humans dwell in the arms of this comic Mother whose breasts feed us. We are her children.\u00a0 We owe everything to her.\u00a0 We return to her in our deaths.\u00a0 The myth of the Great Goddess was born. There is evidence for the presence of this myth reaching back at least 25,000 years.<\/p>\n And this means that the double-deck metaphor reaches back at least 25,000 years.\u00a0 Perhaps this Old Religious Mode is a 100,000 years old.\u00a0 I am asking us to stretch our imaginations back that far in order to underline how astonishing it is for a metaphor that old to die.\u00a0 We live in a culture that can no longer honestly believe in the presence of a mythic world of Goddess or God or gods or goddesses or devils or angels or gremlins or fairies.\u00a0 That once taken-for-granted realm of reality is no longer taken for granted.<\/p>\n But that is not the most amazing part of what has happened to us. We are not left with nothing more than the empirical world of our senses that has been so thoroughly explored by our sciences.\u00a0 In the midst of the empirical world, the other world of Spirit has burned through. Another religious metaphor has appeared that has taken the place of the older one.\u00a0 And this new metaphor enables our minds to translate the religious insights of past ages into something we can point to in our lives today.<\/p>\n Moses, so the story goes, saw an ordinary bush burn with an ethereal flame. But he did not have our secular religious metaphor to think with.\u00a0 His mind appropriated this experience as a Divine Being speaking to him.\u00a0 He attempted to find a name for this Divine Being, but all his two-story mind could fathom was that the \u201cDivinity\u201d has no name comprehensible to the human.\u00a0 Some unfathomable I AM THAT\u00a0 I AM was speaking to him in imperatives that his consciousness was already brooding upon.\u00a0 He heard speech that said \u201cLet my people go.\u201d<\/p>\n Even though we don\u2019t talk with Divine Beings anymore (unless we are crazy), we can grasp what Moses was talking about when he tells us about his talk with WHOMEVER. (Please note that it does not matter that this story about Moses has been elaborated by his descendants.\u00a0 Using mere historical empirical thinking, it is difficult to prove that Moses even existed.\u00a0 But in our memory the Moses figure, whether literary or empirical, still lives as a source of insight into the way WHATEVER interacts with humans.)\u00a0 We can experience and may have experienced many times some ordinary something burning with unordinary fire.\u00a0 And like Moses, we have have felt called to unordinary living that surprised us with our own daring that we may have resisted but did anyway. In the end we may still count such moments as the most important events of our lives.<\/p>\n I have only begun to scratch the surface of what it means to practice a religious practice within this New Religious Mode in which Spirit burns through the ordinary as the depths of the ordinary.\u00a0 This way of seeing makes the ordinary extraordinary.\u00a0 Indeed, there is no dualism of ordinary and extraordinary anymore.\u00a0 There is just one REALTY.\u00a0 All our empirical scientific knowledge about that REALTY is only a tiny scratch of order we have imposed upon that extraordinary LAND OF MYSTERY that is ONE not two or three or many.<\/p>\n In a sense, even an old world hero like Thomas Aquinas might rejoice with us in our New Religious Mode.\u00a0 Clearly, he was a double-deck thinker of great sophistication, stacking the myths of Biblical and Christian thought on top of a foundation of Aristotelian empiricism.\u00a0 He integrated for his culture a way of holding in one life the coming age of science with the Christian treasure chest.\u00a0 Yet one can sense in some of his writing that he was not a strict literalist about his upper deck talk.\u00a0 He knew that he was \u201csupposing\u201d this mythic world.\u00a0 He may not have realized with our clarity the difference between empirical science and mythic talk.\u00a0 He just had no qualms about being dualistic, for he trusted that ONE REALITY supported both his empirical thought and his mythic thought and he knew that thought was capable of pointing beyond itself to a REALITY that could not be thought in a literal sense.\u00a0 The literalization of the second story realm took place after the scientific revolution.<\/p>\n Before that the second story world of mythic talk was just a way of talking about primal matters that humanity had no other way to talk about.\u00a0 The two-story thinking of Aquinas, Luther, Wesley, Jesus, Moses, Teresa, Hildegard, was not a form of ignorance or contempt for nature or anything else we have to reject because it was inherently corrupt.\u00a0 It was just a way of talking.\u00a0 Like ancient Greek or Latin or some other no longer living language, the two-story metaphorical system of thought was good for its time.\u00a0 The remarkable thing is that its time is over.\u00a0 We don\u2019t need it.\u00a0 We certainly cannot retain it in the literalized form that conservative religious communities now believe.\u00a0 Nevertheless, we are so influenced by the literalized version of this old metaphor that it is difficult for us to imagine a time in which it served humanity quite well.<\/p>\n The literalized two-story metaphor is what is hateful toward nature and downright illusory.\u00a0 Having been literalized it is no longer a genuine metaphor for speaking about Spirit reality; it is a rigid belief in a realm of Reality that is above and better than this ordinary realm of reality.\u00a0 Life and death and suffering and sex and joy and emotion and politics and economics and the Earth itself are thereby made secondary to an illusory realm that is used as a substitute for life in the here and now.\u00a0 This was not how the great figures of Christian history understood things.\u00a0 To them it was heresy to hold ordinary life in contempt.\u00a0 The transcendent realm was for them imminent in the ordinary realm.\u00a0 Though Jesus spoke of his Papa in Heaven, Heaven for him was taking place here and now. Heaven can come on Earth.\u00a0 \u201cLook,\u201d Jesus says, \u201cit is happening here and now.\u00a0 The blind see, the deaf hear, and the cripples are walking their lives.\u201d\u00a0 No saying of Jesus needs to imply a literalized two-story worldview.\u00a0 All Jesus\u2019 sayings can be translated out of his taken-for-granted two-story metaphorical talk and put plainly to us in our own metaphorical language.\u00a0 We can understand that in his way he was witnessing to a burning though of the ordinary by the extraordinary that is nothing more nor less than the depth of the ordinary itself.
\n
\nOh Mystery without a name whom I will personally address as my dependable parent, may your ever living Presence come to pass on Earth as it is in the profound essence of every ordinary aspect of our lives.<\/em><\/p>\n